Reviewers Guideline

The peer review process ensures the quality, validity, and relevance of scholarly work published in our journal. Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining academic standards by offering constructive feedback to authors and editorial recommendations to the journal.

1. Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Confidentiality:

All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Do not share or discuss with others unless authorized by the Editor.

  • Objectivity:

Reviews should be conducted objectively and professionally. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate.

  • Timeliness:

If you are unable to complete the review within the allotted time, please inform the editorial office as soon as possible.

  • Conflict of Interest:

Please declare any potential conflicts of interest (personal, professional, or financial) that may affect your judgment.

2. Review Criteria

  • Originality and Significance:

Is the work original? Does it contribute new knowledge or insights?

  • Relevance:

Is the article relevant to the scope and aims of the journal?

  • Clarity and Structure:

Is the article well-written and logically organized? Are the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions clearly stated?

  • Methodology:

Is the research design appropriate and robust? Are the methods clearly described and valid?

  • Data Analysis and Interpretation:

Are the results analyzed correctly and interpreted accurately?

  • References and Citations:

Are references relevant and up to date? Are proper citations used?

  • Ethical Standards:

Has the research been conducted ethically? Are any ethical issues properly addressed?

3. Review Report Format

  • Summary:

Briefly summarize the manuscript and its key contributions.

  • Major Comments:

List significant issues that need to be addressed. This could include flaws in the methodology, gaps in the argument, or areas lacking clarity.

  • Minor Comments:

Provide suggestions for minor improvements such as grammar corrections, formatting issues, or reference inconsistencies.

  • Recommendation:

Choose one of the following:
- Accept without changes
- Minor revisions required
- Major revisions required
- Reject

4. Submission of Review

Please submit your review through the JAZU Online System or as directed by the editorial office.

5. Acknowledgment

We greatly appreciate the time and expertise you bring to the review process. Your contribution helps maintain the academic integrity of our journal.

We are pleased to invite you to join our team of expert reviewers. Your would be a valuable asset to our journal as we strive to maintain high academic standards and publish impactful research across a range of disciplines.